Former police officer Barry Brodd testified in defense of Derek Chauvin last week.
He said Chauvin’s actions in George Floyd’s arrest were “objectively reasonable”.
Vandals splashed red liquid on Saturday and left a pig’s head outside Brodd’s former home, police said.
Visit the Insider homepage for more stories.
Four days after use of force expert Barry Brodd said Derek Chauvin’s actions in arresting George Floyd were “objectively reasonable,” his former home in California was vandalized.
According to a press release from the Santa Rosa Police Department, the current residents of Brodd’s former home were woken up shortly after 3 a.m. on Saturday by a group of subjects who threw a pig’s head on their porch and threw a pig’s head on their porch. smeared blood on the front of their house. “
Police believe the group, dressed all in black, then vandalized a statue in the Santa Rosa Plaza shopping center with a similar substance, believed to be animal blood. A sign has been left behind the statue indicating “Oink Oink”.
Police detractors often refer to officers as “pigs.”
In a statement, Santa Rosa Police wrote that “it appears the suspects … were targeting Mr. Brodd for his testimony.” Police added that Brodd no longer lives in California.
Vandals are wanted for felony because they caused damage over $ 400. No arrests have been made and the police are asking for advice to help them identify those responsible.
Chauvin is currently on trial for the death of George Floyd in May 2020 and is charged with second degree murder, third degree murder and second degree manslaughter. Floyd was pronounced dead after Chauvin knelt on his neck for several minutes during an arrest, while Floyd said he couldn’t breathe.
Brodd’s testimony contradicted that of several experts called by the prosecution, including Minneapolis Police Department chief Medaria Arradondo, who said Chauvin had not received training in his arrest maneuver.
Brodd said at trial: “I felt that Constable Chauvin’s interactions with Mr. Floyd followed his training, followed current police practices and were objectively reasonable.”
“It’s easy to sit down and judge … the conduct of an officer,” he added. “It’s more of a challenge to, again, put yourself in the officer’s shoes to try to make an assessment through what he feels, what he feels, the fear he has, then take a decision.
Brodd also said he did not believe Chauvin used deadly force on Floyd. He compared what happened to an agent tasering a suspect who could fall, hit his head and die.
“This is not an incident of lethal force. It is an accidental death incident,” Brodd testified.
However, medical experts called by the prosecution said Floyd died of lack of oxygen caused by Chauvin’s pressure on his neck.
The cause of death mentioned in the medical examiner’s report is “cardiopulmonary arrest complicating subdual law enforcement, neck restraint and compression”.
Following Brodd’s testimony last week, Santa Rosa Police Chief Ray Navarro released a statement saying that Brodd had not been employed with the department since 2004 and “his comments do not reflect the values and beliefs of the Santa Rosa Police Department “.
Read the original article on Insider