White policeman Derek Chauvin, found guilty of murdering African American George Floyd, asked, Tuesday, the annulment of the verdict, accusing the jury of having had “inappropriate behavior”. His request was filed after photos of one of the twelve jurors appeared in an anti-racist demonstration, which raised questions about his impartiality. His lawyer, Me Eric Nelson, requests “a hearing to quash the verdict on the basis of inappropriate behavior by the jury, threats, intimidation and pressure having weighed on him and / or his failure to follow instructions during deliberations “, According to a document sent to justice. He is also calling for a new trial on the grounds that the judge refused to disorient the trial and isolate the jurors during the hearings, so much so that they, according to him, were influenced by the immense media coverage of the case.
Sentencing June 25
After three weeks of debate and brief deliberation, Derek Chauvin was convicted of the murder of George floyd on April 20 and immediately jailed. His sentence will be returned on June 25. Eight days after this historic verdict, one of the jurors, Brandon Mitchell, a 31-year-old black man, gave several interviews, hoping to encourage African Americans to sit on juries. “Like voting, it can help bring about change,” he said. Since then, a photo of him, wearing a T-shirt in the colors of the Black Lives Matter movement (Black lives count) with the mention “Get your knees off our necks”, has surfaced on social networks.
Brandon Mitchell explained to the local press that he was photographed in this outfit on the sidelines of a large anti-racist demonstration organized in late August in Washington for the anniversary of the historic speech of civil rights leader Martin Luther King “I have a dream”. But, in the questionnaire sent to potential jurors before the trial, he said he had not participated in the protests against the police violence that followed the death of George Floyd.
“His answers were technically correct”
“His answers were technically correct”, since it was a commemoration, notes the expert in jury selection, Jeffrey Frederick. “It is now up to the judge to question him again to see if he had any preconceived ideas or if he lied, and to decide if it is serious enough to affect the outcome of the trial,” he said. he adds. “But the bar is very high to cancel a trial, and that happens very rarely,” he said. Similarly, Steve Tuller, jury selection consultant, believes “unlikely that these revelations change the verdict.” But according to him, “there is no doubt that the defense will use it to appeal.”
Support a professional editorial staff at the service of Brittany and the Bretons: subscribe from € 1 per month.