United States Supreme Search Monday paved the way for a New York attorney to secure former President Donald Assetof tax statements and other financial records in connection with a criminal investigation, a blow to his quest to conceal the details of his finances.
Judges without comment rejected Assetrequest to put on hold a drop from October 7 search ruling ordering the longtime accounting firm of former Republican President Mazars USA to comply with a subpoena to turn over the documents to a grand jury summoned by Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance, a Democrat.
“The work continues,” Vance said in a statement released after the searchthe action of.
Vance had already said in a letter to Assetlawyers in his office would be free to enforce the summons immediately if the judges rejected Assetthe request of.
A lawyer for Asset did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Supreme Search, who has a conservative 6-3 majority including three Asset appointed, had already ruled once in the dispute, rejecting last July AssetThe general argument that he was immune from criminal investigation as sitting president.
Unlike all other recent American presidents, Asset refused during his four years in office to do tax returns public. The data could provide details about his assets and the activities of his family-owned real estate company, the Asset Organization.
Asset, who left office on Jan.20 after being defeated in his reelection bid on Nov. 3 by Democrat Joe Biden, continues to face an array of legal issues regarding his personal and professional conduct.
Vance issued a summons to Mazars in August 2019 requesting Assetcorporate and personal tax returns from 2011 to 2018. Assetthe company’s lawyers have filed a lawsuit to block the subpoena, arguing that as sitting chairman, Asset enjoyed absolute immunity from state criminal investigations.
The Supreme Search in its July ruling rejected these arguments but stated Asset could raise other objections to the summons. Assetthe lawyers then pleaded before searchs that the subpoena was too broad and amounted to political harassment, but US District Judge Victor Marrero in August and the New York-based US 2nd Circuit Search appeals in October rejected those requests.
Vance’s investigation, which began more than two years ago, had focused on the silent payments former attorney and restorative President Michael Cohen made ahead of the 2016 election to two women – the actress adult movie Stormy Daniels and former Playboy model Karen McDougal – who said they had sex with Asset.
During the last search deposits, Vance suggested that the investigation is now broader and could focus on a potential bank, tax and insurance fraud, as well as the falsification of business records.
In a separate litigation, the Democratic-led U.S. House of Representatives was looking to subpoena similar cases. The Supreme Search in July sent this question down searchs for further consideration.
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up to become a founding member and help shape the next chapter of HuffPost