Twitter slammed by companies for ads displayed alongside child porn accounts, ad campaigns suspended


Some big advertisers, including Dyson, Mazda and chemical company Ecolab, have suspended their marketing campaigns or removed their ads from parts of Twitter because their promotions appear alongside tweets soliciting child pornography, the companies said at Reuters.

Ads for at least 30 brands, ranging from Walt Disney, NBCUniversal to Comcast and Coca-Cola to a children’s hospital, have appeared on the profile pages of Twitter accounts that peddle links to exploit material, a review finds Reuters accounts identified in new research into online child sexual abuse by cybersecurity group Ghost Data.

Some of the tweets include keywords related to “rape” and “teenagers” and appeared alongside promoted tweets from corporate advertisers, according to the Reuters study. In one example, a tweet promoted for footwear and accessories brand Cole Haan appeared alongside a tweet in which a user said they were “swapping teen/kids content.”

“We are horrified,” David Maddocks, brand president at Cole Haan, told Reuters after being told the company’s ads were appearing alongside those tweets. “Twitter will either fix this problem or we will fix it any way we can, which includes not buying Twitter ads.”

In another example, a user tweeted looking for the content “Yung girls ONLY, NO Boys”, which was immediately followed by a tweet promoted for the Texas-based Scottish Rite Children’s Hospital. Scottish Rite did not return multiple requests for comment.

In a statement, Twitter spokeswoman Celeste Carswell said the company “has zero tolerance for the sexual exploitation of children” and is investing more resources dedicated to child safety, including hiring new staff. positions to write policies and implement solutions.

She added that Twitter was working closely with its customers and advertising partners to investigate and take action to prevent the situation from happening again.

Twitter’s difficulties in identifying child pornography material were first reported in a survey conducted by tech news site The Verge in late August. The emerging pushback from advertisers who are essential to Twitter’s revenue stream is reported here by Reuters for the first time.

Like all social media platforms, Twitter prohibits depictions of child sexual exploitation, which are illegal in most countries. But it allows adult content in general and is home to a thriving exchange of pornographic images, which accounts for about 13% of all content on Twitter, according to an internal company document seen by Reuters.

Twitter declined to comment on the volume of adult content on the platform.

Ghost Data identified more than 500 accounts that openly shared or requested child pornography material over a 20-day period this month. Twitter failed to remove more than 70% of accounts during the study period, according to the group, which shared the results exclusively with Reuters. Reuters could not independently confirm the accuracy of Ghost Data’s findings.

After Reuters shared a sample of 20 accounts with Twitter, the company removed about 300 more accounts from the network, but more than 100 more remained on the site the next day, according to Ghost Data and a Reuters review.

Reuters then shared the full list of more than 500 accounts after it was provided by Ghost Data, which Twitter reviewed and permanently suspended for violating its rules, Twitter’s Carswell said.

Andrea Stroppa, the founder of Ghost Data, said the study was an attempt to gauge Twitter’s ability to remove the material. He said he personally funded the research after receiving advice on the subject.

Twitter suspended more than one million accounts last year for child exploitation material, according to the company’s transparency reports.

“There is no place for this type of content online,” a spokesperson for automaker Mazda USA said in a statement to Reuters, adding that in response the company is now banning its ads from appear on Twitter profile pages.

A Disney spokesperson called the content “objectionable” and said they are “increasing efforts to ensure that the digital platforms we advertise on and the media buyers we use are stepping up their efforts to prevent such errors from happening again”.

A spokesperson for Coca-Cola, who surfaced a promoted tweet on an account tracked by the researchers, said it does not condone material associated with its brand and said “any violation of these standards is unacceptable. and taken very seriously.”

NBCUniversal said it asked Twitter to remove ads associated with inappropriate content.

Code words

Twitter isn’t alone in grappling with moderation failures related to child safety online. Child protection advocates say the number of known child sexual abuse images has risen from thousands to tens of millions in recent years as predators have taken to social media, including Facebook and Instagram of Meta, to prepare victims and exchange explicit images.

For accounts identified by Ghost Data, nearly all marketers of child sexual exploitation material marketed the material on Twitter and then asked buyers to contact them on messaging services such as Discord and Telegram to complete payment and to receive the files, which have been stored. on hosting platforms such as New Zealand-based Mega and US-based Dropbox, according to the group’s report.

A Discord spokesperson said the company banned a server and a user for breaking its rules against sharing links or content that sexualizes children.

Mega said a link referenced in the Ghost Data report was created in early August and shortly thereafter deleted by the user, whom it declined to identify. Mega said it permanently closed the user’s account two days later.

Dropbox and Telegram said they use various tools to moderate content, but did not provide additional details on how they would respond to the report.

Still, the advertisers’ backlash poses a risk to the business of Twitter, which derives more than 90% of its revenue from the sale of digital ad placements to brands seeking to market products to the Twitter’s 237 million daily active users. service.

Twitter is also battling in court Tesla CEO and billionaire Elon Musk, who is trying to pull out of a $44 billion (roughly Rs. 3,60,300 crore) deal to buy the social media company following complaints about the prevalence of spam accounts and its impact on the business.

A team of Twitter employees concluded in a report dated February 2021 that the company needed more investment to identify and remove large-scale child exploitation material, noting that the company had a backlog of cases to review for possible reporting to law enforcement.

“While the amount of (child sexual exploitation content) has grown exponentially, Twitter’s investment in technologies to detect and manage the growth has not increased,” according to the report, which was prepared by an internal team to provide insight into the status of child exploitation material on Twitter and receive legal advice on proposed strategies.

“Recent reports on Twitter provide an outdated, snapshot view of just one aspect of our work in this space, and don’t accurately reflect where we are today,” Carswell said.

Traffickers often use code words such as “cp” for child pornography and are “intentionally as vague as possible” to avoid detection, according to internal documents. The more Twitter cracks down on certain keywords, the more users are pressured into using obfuscated text, which “tends to be harder for (Twitter) to automate,” according to the documents.

Ghost Data’s Stroppa said such tricks would complicate efforts to track down the materials, but noted that his small team of five researchers and no access to internal Twitter resources were able to find hundreds of accounts in 20 days.

Twitter did not respond to a request for additional comment.

© Thomson Reuters 2022


Affiliate links may be generated automatically – see our ethics statement for details.

Tech

Not all news on the site expresses the point of view of the site, but we transmit this news automatically and translate it through programmatic technology on the site and not from a human editor.
Back to top button