In December, 156,000 women lost their jobs; men won 16,000, according to an analysis by the National Women’s Law Center. But, as is generally the case, the assessment of “women” as a general category hides something important: Further analysis of the data revealed that it is black, Latin and Asian-American women. suffered job losses – white women actually got jobs. It is expected that when many unemployed women re-enter the workforce, they will receive lower wages than before.
Last year, 2.3 million American women were reported to have left the workforce – often to care for children when school and daycare closed. Because they have completely left the labor market and are not looking for new jobs, they are no longer counted in the unemployment statistics.
Last year, US billionaires got $ 1.1 trillion richer. All of this, in the midst of perverse debates about the lives it is acceptable to sacrifice to save the economy. President Trump admitted in May that as we resume economic activity more people will die, but, he said, “we have to get our country back.” From which country? Back for who?
It’s a little less than surprising that there is a growing thirst for another way, a society less stubbornly resistant to valuing human life when it stands in the way of profit for a wealthy, white, and often male ruling class. A company “that allows millionaires to store their wealth in empty apartments while homeless families navigate the streets,” Keeanga-Yamahtta Taylor wrote in March, “that threatens eviction and defaults as hundreds of millions of people are mandated to stay indoors to suppress the virus, is disconcerting at its inconsistency and inhumanity.
Taylor is part of a generation of academics and activists bringing renewed attention to the left-wing, often black-led, wings of the feminist movement that have been excluded by mainstream white feminism. Writing in 1984, Hooks summed it up this way: “Particularly with regard to work, many liberal feminist reforms have simply strengthened capitalist and materialist values (exemplifying the flexibility of capitalism) without really liberating women economically. Many writers of this era, including Hooks, Angela Davis, Audre Lorde, and members of the Combahee River Collective, have always emphasized what is now widely considered common sense: feminism is both toothless and hypocritical if it is. ignores the material needs of women who are poor, black, gay, trans, disabled, immigrant or living outside the United States. Their legacy has been echoed by contemporary social justice activists and academics like Taylor, Adrienne Maree Brown, Rachel Cargle, Dean Spade and Mariame Kaba. This is where the energy of the left now lies, if not most of the money or institutional power.
There is a pressing question at hand, still unanswered, about how the American feminist movement is going to pull itself together now and whether it will push in an ideological direction more aligned with the thinkers it has marginalized. The “liberal feminist reforms” of the late 20th century, which evolved into 21st century corporate feminism. This has reached its logical end point in the brand and slogan feminism of the past 10 years. There was a “lean in” feminism, which held that the entry of women into the C-suite required only the right kind of will to power and a determined oblivion of the demands of family formation. There was the swagification phase: THE FUTURE IS Ladies’ T-shirts, “Nonetheless She Persisted” baseball caps. There was the wing merchandise store (the high-priced “women’s space”, pale pink interiors and, as employees claimed, an abusive and racist internal culture) selling very popular “Head” pins. Witch In Charge ”and“ Girls Doing ”. Regardless [Expletive] They want ‘keychains.
It turns out that the “girls”, or more accurately the women, couldn’t do what they wanted this year. However – as people have pointed out about key chains – to generalize to “women” as a cover category is a misguided perspective. (“What do you mean when you say women?”, I asked Federici on one of our walks. “For me it has always been mainly in terms of the political category,” she said. declared, defining “women” as all those who suffer the material conditions that have historically been assigned to women, which include trans and non-binary people, intersex and agender people, and queer people.) And years like 2020 do not fall. not uniformly on all women.