The “ideal track” is a myth, isn’t it? • TechCrunch

when it comes in consulting, tech likes standardization. Startups are often told that there are certain metrics to hit, deadlines to meet, timelines to measure against.

Examples abound: here’s the ideal amount of money to raise on your Series A round; here’s how many employees you should have before hiring this executive; this is the stage at which to hire a legal advisor; and, most recently, here’s the percentage of employees you should lay off if you can’t get more funding.

(The answer is 20% of staff, depending on who you ask).

There is an answer to some of these general statements: startups are complicated, and one size certainly doesn’t fit all. Nonetheless, these startup standards help steer businesses in the right direction, becoming the status quo at some point.

That’s why when entrepreneur Paul Graham, co-founder of Y Combinator, suggested that he sees startups with 20 years of trail thanks to huge fundraisers in 2021, it hit me. Isn’t the general advice that startups should have three years of trail? What if we are in a more bullish market, 18 months?

My belated reaction to that August tweet aside, let’s talk about the track. As you can see from the title of this article, I think the ideal track length is a myth – alongside other startup myths like more money equals more growth. By the end of this article, you might agree.


Not all news on the site expresses the point of view of the site, but we transmit this news automatically and translate it through programmatic technology on the site and not from a human editor.
Back to top button