Skip to content
Texas lawmakers issue 20 articles of impeachment against state AG Paxton

Paxton has been investigated by the FBI for years on charges he used his office to help a donor and was charged separately with securities fraud in 2015 but has yet to stand trial.

When the five-member committee’s investigation came to light on Tuesday, Paxton suggested it was a political attack by “liberal” Republican House Speaker Dade Phelan. He called for Phelan’s resignation and accused him of being drunk during a marathon session last Friday. Phelan’s office brushed off the accusation as Paxton tried to “save face”.

“This is a sad day for Texas as we see the corrupt political establishment unite in this illegitimate attempt to subvert the will of the people and disenfranchise the voters of our state,” Paxton said in a statement. statement Thursday, calling the committee’s findings “hearsay and gossip, repeating claims long refuted.

In acting against him, Paxton said, “The RINOs in the Texas Legislature are now on the same side as Joe Biden.”

Impeachment requires a majority vote of the state House chamber, usually made up of 150 members, which Republicans now control 85 to 64, since a GOP representative resigned ahead of a scheduled vote for the expelled following the conclusion that he had engaged in inappropriate sexual conduct with an intern.

It’s unclear how many supporters Paxton may have in the House. Since the prospect of impeachment suddenly surfaced on Wednesday, none of the other leading Republicans in Texas have voiced support for Paxton.

The articles of impeachment issued by the investigating committee, which includes three Republicans and two Democrats, largely stem from Paxton’s relationship with one of his wealthy donors. These 20 counts largely deal with Paxton’s alleged efforts to shield the donor from an FBI investigation and his own attempts to thwart whistleblower complaints filed by his own staff.

The timing of a vote by the House is also unclear. Rep. Andrew Murr, Republican chairman of the inquiry, said he didn’t have a timeline and Phelan’s office declined to comment.

Unlike Congress, impeachment in Texas requires immediate removal until a trial takes place in the Senate. Republican Gov. Greg Abbott could appoint an interim replacement. Permanent withdrawal would require two-thirds support in the Senate, of which Paxton’s wife, Angela, is a member.

Paxton, 60, faces being ousted by GOP lawmakers just seven months after easily winning a third term against challengers — including George P. Bush — who had urged voters to reject a compromised incumbent but found that many did not know Paxton. litany of alleged wrongdoings or characterized the charges as political attacks.

Even as the end of Monday’s regular session nears, state law allows the House to continue working on impeachment proceedings. He could also remember in session later. The Senate has the same options.

In a sense, Paxton’s political peril has come at breakneck speed: The House committee’s investigation came to light on Tuesday, followed the next day by an extraordinary public broadcast of alleged criminal acts he committed as a as one of the most powerful figures in Texas.

But for Paxton’s critics, who now include a growing portion of his own party in the Texas Capitol, the rebuke has gone on for years.

In 2014, he admitted to violating Texas securities law by not registering as an investment adviser while soliciting clients. A year later, Paxton was indicted by a grand jury on a felony charge in his hometown near Dallas, where he was charged with defrauding investors in a tech startup. He pleaded not guilty to two counts carrying a potential sentence of five to 99 years in prison.

He opened a legal defense fund and accepted $100,000 from an executive whose company was being investigated by Paxton’s office for Medicaid fraud. Another $50,000 was donated by an Arizona retiree whose son Paxton was later hired into a high-ranking position but was soon fired after he tried to make a point by posting child pornography during a ‘a meeting.

What triggered the most serious risk for Paxton was his relationship with another wealthy donor, Austin real estate developer Nate Paul.

Several of Paxton’s top aides in 2020 have said they fear the attorney general is abusing the powers of his office to help Paul over unproven allegations that an elaborate plot to steal $200 million from his properties was in progress. course. The FBI searched Paul’s home in 2019, but he was not charged and his attorneys denied wrongdoing. Paxton also told staff members that he had been having an affair with a woman who it later emerged worked for Paul.

Paxton’s aides accused him of corruption and were all fired or resigned after reporting him to the FBI. Four sued under Texas whistleblower laws, accusing Paxton of wrongful retaliation, and in February agreed to settle the case for $3.3 million. But the Texas House must approve the payment, and Phelan said he doesn’t think taxpayers should foot the bill.

Shortly after the settlement was reached, the House investigation into Paxton began. The investigation amounted to a rare scrutiny of Paxton in the state Capitol, where many Republicans have long taken a silent stance on the charges that followed the attorney general.

Only twice has the Texas House removed a sitting official: Governor James Ferguson in 1917 and State Judge OP Carrillo in 1975.


Not all news on the site expresses the point of view of the site, but we transmit this news automatically and translate it through programmatic technology on the site and not from a human editor.