A San Antonio doctor who admitted to defying Texas’ new abortion law by performing the procedure on a woman more than six weeks pregnant may have to defend his decision in court.
Dr. Alan Braid wrote an essay published Saturday in the Washington Post in which he said he performed the abortion on the woman earlier this month, despite state law now banning post-abortion. sixth week of pregnancy.
The doctor’s goal, in addition to “duty of care” to his patient, was “make sure Texas doesn’t get away with trying to prevent this blatantly unconstitutional law from being tested, ”he wrote in an essay in the Washington Post on Saturday.
Now it looks like Braid will say more: An Arkansas man filed a lawsuit against him on Monday, according to the Washington Post.
Oscar Stilley, a former lawyer convicted of tax evasion in 2010 and serving a 15-year house arrest sentence, told the newspaper that while he is not personally opposed to abortion, he believes the measure should be subject to judicial review.
“If the law is not good, why would we have to go through a long and drawn out process to find out if this is hogwash? Stilley told the Post after filing the complaint in Bexar County State Court, where is San Antonio.
The new law bypasses judicial scrutiny by allowing people to bring civil suits against abortion practitioners and anyone who “assists” with an illegal abortion. Plaintiffs who win in court may receive bonuses of at least $ 10,000, and Stilley admits the money wouldn’t bother him.
“If the state of Texas decided it was going to give a bonus of $ 10,000, why shouldn’t I get that bonus of 10,000?” ” he said.
Braid hasn’t commented on the costume, but Marc Hearron of the Center for Reproductive Rights, which represents the Braid clinics, told the Post that the lawsuit suggests there will be more.
“SB 8 says ‘anyone’ can take legal action for violation, and we’re starting to see that happening, including by out-of-state claimants,” Hearron said.
The Justice Department filed a lawsuit earlier this month against Texas, arguing that the new law violates the U.S. Constitution.
The trial announcement comes on the same day the Supreme Court announced that in December it would hear oral argument in a Mississippi that is a direct challenge to Roe v. Wade, the landmark 1973 Supreme Court ruling that protects a woman’s right to have an abortion. without excessive government restriction.
Calling all HuffPost superfans!
Sign up to become a founding member and help shape the next chapter of HuffPost