Supreme Court ruling on Miranda weakens civil rights, activists say


Supreme Court ruling on Miranda weakens civil rights, activists say

  • The conservative majority 6-3 decision found that failing to read someone their Miranda warning does not allow law enforcement to be sued for violating someone’s civil rights.
  • The decision opens a major avenue for the police to provide a warning to Miranda and hold him accountable.
  • People should say explicitly and affirmatively to police, “I want my lawyer and I want to keep quiet,” and then keep quiet, civil rights experts have said.

The magic words beginning Miranda’s warning that many know by heart – “you have the right to remain silent” – may be written into Hollywood shows and movies, but Thursday’s Supreme Court ruling means its protections civil rights will be significantly curtailed, legal experts have said. USA TODAY.

The 6-3 decision, with the court’s three liberal judges dissenting, in Vega v. Tekoh, essentially concluded that failing to “mirandize” or give someone their Miranda warning, does not qualify a person to sue law enforcement for a violation of federal civil rights. Fifth Amendment protection against coerced self-incrimination.

Help Terms of Service Privacy Policy Your California Privacy Rights / Privacy Policy Our Ethical Principles Sitemap

© 2022 USA TODAY, a division of Gannett Satellite Information Network, LLC.


USA Today

Not all news on the site expresses the point of view of the site, but we transmit this news automatically and translate it through programmatic technology on the site and not from a human editor.
Back to top button