Skip to content

“There have been many entertaining public debates as we work to reopen our schools,” Gabriela López, chair of the San Francisco Unified School District Board wrote in a letter published in the San Francisco Chronicle and told him Twitter Sunday count. “The school name change is one of them.”

López said the name change process “began in 2018 with a schedule that did not anticipate a pandemic.”

“I recognize and take responsibility that mistakes were made in the name change process,” she wrote.

Sunday’s statement, López said, will be the last time she will publicly comment on the schools’ renaming, “until the schools are reopened.”

“We will not take precious time from our board agendas to discuss it further, as we need to prioritize reopening,” López wrote.

“I want us to focus our time and actions where they matter most. On the safety of our children and getting them safely back to school.

The news comes about a month after the school board voted 6-1 to rename 44 campuses linked to controversial public figures, including former Presidents George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, and current US Senator Dianne Feinstein.

It was the last school district to make such a decision – in recent years, city councils and school districts across the country have renamed buildings and removed monuments dedicated to Confederate leaders who fought to preserve slavery and supremacy. white in America.

In January, after the school board vote, San Francisco Mayor London Breed said she supported the board’s decision to rename the schools. However, she also expressed her frustration that the board has yet to develop a plan to reopen the schools.

“What I cannot understand is why the school board is putting forward a plan for all these schools to be renamed by April, when there is no plan for our children to come back to class. ‘here there,’ Breed said last month.

“Our students are suffering, and we should be talking about getting them into classrooms, providing them with mental health support and providing them with the resources they need during this difficult time. Our families are frustrated with the lack of a plan, and they are especially frustrated that discussion of these plans was not even on the agenda for last night’s school board meeting. “

The district, which includes 140 public schools from kindergarten to grade 12, is one of many countries that have introduced distance education due to the pandemic.

Earlier this month, the San Francisco city attorney filed an emergency court order to open schools shortly after city leaders announced a lawsuit against its own school system for “failing to not have proposed a reopening plan “for the students served by the district.

On Saturday, SFUSD released its blended learning proposal this spring. The district has said it is committed to prioritizing students for one-day in-person learning, which is determined by physical space, enrollment, staffing and family interests.

SFUSD did not provide further details of the plan and directed CNN to the letter in the Chronicle.

Allen Kim contributed to this report.


Source link