Skip to content


The prime-time event, which airs Sunday night in the United States, has been relentlessly promoted by CBS and threatens to lift the veil on a litany of frustrations and grievances held by the couple against the institution. that they left last year.

“I don’t know how they could expect that after all this time we would just stay silent if there is an active role The Firm is playing in perpetuating the lies about us,” Meghan said in a clip. already published, hinting that she is ready to escalate a war of words between herself and the family she married into.

Insatiable British tabloid press has long speculated Meghan felt restrained by the palace before and after her marriage to Harry in 2018, that the couple feuded with some of their loved ones and that their decision to step down from their roles caused a major rift with the rest of the clan.

These theories are certain to be polled in the interview, giving viewers a first official account after years of intrigue at the palace.

“It’s really liberating to be able to have the right and the privilege in some ways to be able to say yes” to the interview, Meghan said in a preview, discussing the constraints that prevent her from speaking to the media while she was royal work. “I mean … I’m ready to talk.”

A unique challenge for the Palace

As the sun rises in the UK on Monday, the public will have a new perspective from former royals on the palace machinations.

This week has seen a frenzy of stories citing anonymous sources and royal commentators, but the palace has adhered to its usual protocol of silence in the face of speculative reporting surrounding the show.

He said on Wednesday, however, that he would investigate allegations that Meghan intimidated staff members, allegations anonymously in a UK newspaper that the Sussex spokesman called a “calculated smear campaign.”

“It is no coincidence that distorted, years-old accusations of undermining the Duchess were being reported to the British media shortly before she and the Duke spoke openly and honestly about their experience of these recent years, “their statement added on Wednesday. .

Prince Harry and Meghan interview: the world is waiting for a bomb made for television

On Sunday morning, the front pages of several UK newspapers focused on the impending show, with some reporting the Queen would not be watching. The Mail on Sunday featured a royal source on its front page denouncing public interest in the program – but devoted 11 pages to the interview preview.

It all comes at an already difficult time for the royal family, Prince Philip, the Queen’s 99-year-old husband, spending a third week in hospital, after undergoing heart surgery on Thursday.

But royals probably know from history the impact the TV show could have. The Palace encounters a TV movie bomb roughly once in a generation; a 1970 interview with abdicated King Edward VIII and Wallis Simpson posed problems for the palace, 25 years before Princess Diana’s “Panorama” confessional was viewed by tens of millions in Britain.

What makes the Sussexes’ conversation so unique is their continued closeness to the monarchy – Harry is still sixth on the throne – and their unwavering popularity, which they have already started trading for seemingly lucrative media addresses and deals. .

But their moves to date make it clear that palace insiders aren’t their only targets. The duo will likely keep their harshest words for the British tabloids, which have relentlessly pursued them for years.

“We all know how the British press can be … and it was destroying my sanity,” Harry told James Corden during a television appearance last month. “I was like, ‘This is toxic,’ so I did what any husband and any father would do: I need to get my family out of here. ‘
Prince Harry and Meghan interview: the world is waiting for a bomb made for television

The couple carried out several lawsuits against publications and photo agencies that had printed details of their private lives.

Earlier this year, Meghan won a lawsuit against the Mail’s editors on Sunday after publishing a letter she sent to her father and issued a scathing rebuke for “dehumanizing” media organizations after the verdict, claiming that ” the damage they have caused and continue to do is profound. “

“It was incredibly difficult for both of us, but at least we had met,” Harry told Winfrey in another promotional clip, drawing parallels between their experience and that of his mother, Princess Diana, who was also exiled from the royal family. in the 1990s.

The door was closed on a potential return for the pair as royals earlier this year.

But even this announcement was shrouded in tension; Harry and Meghan’s statement that “the service is universal” was widely seen as a rebuke of the palace’s framing of events, after the Queen confirmed that “by stepping away from the work of the Royal Family, he didn’t It is not possible to continue with the responsibilities and duties that accompany a life of public service. “

Nonetheless, the conversation means they can begin the task of reclaiming the narrative of their royal split, finally free to make any media engagements they choose and sculpt their new lives as celebrity activists.

.



Source link