Magaly Medina refers to the sentence in the Jefferson Farfán case: “They are violating my right to legitimate defense”
Magaly Medina She was extremely concerned when she found out that this Tuesday, May 30, a sentence will be read against her. According to ‘Magpie’the lawsuit for defamation that he imposed Jefferson Farfan a few years ago, it will be resolved, but not in the way she expected.
“It seems to me that my right to defense is being violated and these things do not happen to me, just once, due to neglect in my defense, and in everything that was my legal apparatus, I went to jail, because that really I was an oversight of my lawyer, who did not coordinate with the channel the steps to follow ”, he began by saying.
In this sense, the conductor of ‘Magaly TV La Firme’ proceeded to report on what happened, pointing out that the 38th Criminal Court would not be following the regulations of the Judiciary, since it has not allowed her lawyer to defend her after the investigations against her were finished.
“This time, suddenly, there are lawsuits that have begun to have feet, that have begun to have movement, suddenly several courts want to sentence me, with the axe, and that is not done, in addition, the Judiciary has regulations that are complied with ”, he indicated.
“My lawyer surprised me by telling me that I have a sentence reading, in one of the cases that Jefferson Farfán brought to me several years ago, when it bothered him that they mentioned Yahaira Plasencia to him,” he commented.
In that sense, Magaly Medina He specified that this May 30th he will be sentenced along with his producer, although the judge has not followed due process, for which he considered that this sentence would lack legitimacy.
“They tell me that on May 30, the judge of the 38th Criminal Court has ruled that I am going to be sentenced along with my producer. I have spoken with my lawyer and he tells me that the judge is violating a rule, therefore, she is violating my right to self-defense, in addition to the fact that every defendant has the right to due process, ”she added.
La ‘Urraca’ explained her case in a little more detail, indicating that when the investigations of her case were finished, the judge should have sent the file to her lawyer, so that within five days he would appear and formulate his defense allegations, as well as the other party involved.
“This time they have not let my lawyer present the defense arguments, which seems tremendous. I believe that among the public there must be a lawyer, judges, criminal lawyers who know that this is not done. Once all the investigation is done in a defamation case, then the file is passed so that the lawyers of both parties give their corresponding allegations, ”he assured.
infobae Sp
