“Also, it would make life more difficult for transgender children, who are among Louisianans most vulnerable when it comes to mental health issues,” said Edwards. “We should be looking for more ways to unite rather than divide our citizens.”
CNN has reached out to the bill’s sponsor, Republican State Senator Beth Mizell, for comment on the veto.
Mizell had told CNN last month that she was not sure there was enough support to override a possible veto, but that she “just hoped the governor would see the support and understand that it was a woman’s problem to support women, “arguing the bill is not intentionally discriminatory despite the fact that it targets trans women. Mizell also said at the time that she could not cite any example of Louisianans complaining that a trans woman was on a women’s team, but argued the bill was necessary to avoid future “problems”.
The bill would have required elementary, high school and college sports teams that receive state funding to be designated on the basis of “biological sex,” thereby prohibiting trans women and girls from participating in women’s sports teams.
Although the bill does not define “biological sex,” the term has been used by Republican lawmakers across the country to refer to the sex assigned at birth on the basis of reproductive biology and genetics.
While sex is a category that refers widely to physiology, a person’s gender is an innate sense of identity. The factors that go into determining the sex shown on a person’s birth certificate can include anatomy, genetics, and hormones, and there is great natural variation in each of these categories.
For this reason, the language of “biological sex”, as used in this legislation, can be overly simplistic and misleading.
SB 156 would also have protected schools, coaches and other school employees enforcing the ban on legal action, and would allow cisgender women to take legal action if they claimed to have been “deprived of their rights.” ‘a sporting opportunity’ because of a violation of the proposed ban. .
In vetoing the legislation on Tuesday, Edwards pointed to a recent NCAA announcement that the body does not support such bans and is monitoring them closely to ensure the NCAA Championships can run welcoming and respectful of all participants. “
“While there is nothing wrong with this bill to solve, it has real problems in that it makes it more likely that the NCAA and professional championships, like the 2022 Final Four, will happen. not in our state, ”he said in the statement. .