Skip to content
Kevin Spacey’s accuser must reveal his name for trial to continue, judge says

A man accusing Oscar-winning actor Kevin Spacey of sexually abusing him in the 1980s when he was 14 cannot proceed anonymously in court, a judge said on Monday.

U.S. District Judge Lewis A. Kaplan in Manhattan refused to let the man proceed solely as a “CD” in a September lawsuit filed in New York State court and later transferred to the New York State court. federal court.

The man had met Spacey in the New York suburbs acting class before the alleged abuse, according to the lawsuit which claims more than $ 40 million in damages.

Kaplan said CD’s interest in privacy did not outweigh the presumption of open legal process and the prejudice to Spacey’s defense that would occur if he could proceed anonymously. People with information that could support Spacey would not be able to come forward either, the judge added.

CD since the 1990s had spoken to an unknown number of people about his allegations against Spacey and had apparently cooperated for a New York magazine article that appeared on an online website, “Vulture,” in November 2017, said Kaplan.

He said that “the evidence suggests that CD knowingly and repeatedly took the risk that one of these people, at one point or another, would reveal his true identity in a way that would carry that identity to the attention of the general public. “

Kaplan noted that CD also recruited co-plaintiff, Anthony Rapp, who appeared on Broadway’s “Rent” and television’s “Star Trek: Discovery” for the trial. The lawsuit said the older actor made a sexual advance to teenage Rapp at a 1980s party.

When Rapp first spoke publicly about his claim in 2017, others also went public and Spacey’s then famous career came to an abrupt end. At the time, Spacey released a statement saying he didn’t remember the meeting but apologized.

The judge said lawyers for CD claim that the use of their client’s name will trigger post-traumatic stress disorder and that the ensuing anxiety, nightmares and depression is a consequence that probably cannot be avoided as the case progressed and CD was eventually forced to testify in public. .

He gave lawyers 10 days to reveal CD’s name if he continued to make claims.

In a letter to the judge in early March, lawyer Peter Saghir said CD felt “extreme anxiety and psychological distress at the very thought of being compelled to proceed publicly” and had reluctantly decided to abandon his claims. asks if Kaplan ordered him to proceed publicly.


Source link