Nature

Gutfeld helps Judge Jackson and the media define “woman”


NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The Supreme Court hearings gave us an invaluable nugget.

SEN. MARSHA BLACKBURN: Can you give a definition of the word woman?

JACKSON J.: Can I give a definition?

BLACKBURN: Yeah.

JACKSON: I can not.

BLACKBURN: You can not ?

JACKSON: Not in this context. I am not a biologist.

This shouldn’t be a difficult question to answer. If someone asked me, “Hey, Greg, what’s a woman?” I would just show him a picture of Jessica Rabbit. Yeah, she still tingles in all the wrong places.

Supreme Court nominee Ketanji Brown Jackson. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)

But why was it so difficult for a judge to answer this question? Because we let the awakened take the clearest distinctions in life and destroy them?

And now people are terrified of the facts. It’s part of the left’s trifecta: creating victims, creating new reasons to call people fanatics, and giving university professors something to waste their time.

USA Today came to Jackson’s defense, but completely screwed him up by using only gender studies specialists.

RELAXED REPUBLICANS THAT KETANJI BROWN JACKSON CAN’T SAY WHAT A WOMAN IS: ‘IT’S A SIMPLE QUESTION’

Yes, there are gender studies specialists. It’s like being a big munchkin. In the health and wellness section, ironically, the headline reads: “Marsha Blackburn Asked Kentanji Brown Jackson to Define ‘Woman’. Science Says There’s No Simple Answer.”

Yeah, the same people who coined the phrase “follow the science” then ignored their own advice when it didn’t benefit their politics.

So I guess we can’t call Jackson the first black female Supreme Court justice because according to them she might not be female.

But really, what is feminine has been a simple question for the 300,000 years that humans have existed. Only in the last decade have idiots made this a trick question in a biology test.

And why? Because they prefer ideology over biology, so there’s no way to clearly define what makes someone a woman.

Well, I had an idea to end this debate. Ask 100 men on the street. They will define a woman as a human being who has a nurturing side, who could be emotionally strong like a bull, who will always support you forever, and possibly the most beautiful creatures on Earth, but who cannot park in parallel – sounds like a sexist.

But that’s where USA Today screwed up. They only interviewed experts in gender studies on questions of biology. It’s like interviewing Dana Perino about death metal.

And they all said Jackson was wrong to even cite biology. You thought Jackson was awake?

When it comes to defining a woman to these zombies, it’s Andrew Dice Clay.

But this is from the monsters that brought you 2 + 2 doesn’t need to equal 4. So they believe the judge kicked by referring to biology.

According to gender studies professor Rebecca Jordan-Young, there isn’t even a singular biological answer to “what is a woman.”

Sarah Richardson, another gender expert, says that “science cannot settle what are really social issues”.

So your gender is social, not biological. And I thought Bill Clinton was an impostor for trying to redefine what “is”. No wonder guys can share women’s locker rooms, use women’s bathrooms, and perverted men can get into women’s prisons.

Former President Bill Clinton.  (Photo by Say Cheese!/GC Images)

Former President Bill Clinton. (Photo by Say Cheese!/GC Images)

If sex is just a social thing, you can do or say almost anything. In this way, a fact goes from what is to what people say it is, and biology, which is based on absolutes, is as unwelcome as Katie Pavlich at a PETA rally.

Gender studies is like astrology. With astrology, you look up to the sky and make things up. With gender studies, you look down into the locker room and then you deny reality.

Juliet Williams, another gender expert, says white supremacists have denied that black women and women of color are women.

Well then, wouldn’t you embrace biology, which disproves that? You know, if you think about it, she uses horrible racism to justify erasing women.

Lya Thomas.

Lya Thomas.
(AP Photo/John Bazemore)

That logic backs off faster than me in the ring with Tyrus.

They then deny the reality regarding Lia Thomas, the trans swimmer who skims biological females in the pool.

Gender teacher Kate Mason says “many people are assigned male at birth, have higher testosterone levels” and could never make a Division 1 swim team. we [Thomas’s] current success to her assigned gender, rather than her long record as an elite swimmer?”

Well, you do drugs, because she was an OK swimmer who now beats exceptional female swimmers precisely because they lack the innate muscle mass that her masculinity gave her, you do drugs.

She confuses all men who are not better swimmers than elite women to deny the fact that a mediocre man can dominate the female ranks. How crazy is that? And forgive me for saying “crazy”. I mean the kind that squirrels eat.

This nonsense makes me irritable. I am sorry.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

So what defines a woman in the article? They say, embrace reproductive justice, fight against unequal investment in girls’ sport and wage discrimination.

Again, it’s not biology – it’s ideology, which means a woman can live her whole life without being a woman because she doesn’t obey the doctrines of graduates in gender studies.

It’s intellectual fascism, not biology.

And I say that as a proud woman of color.

This article is adapted from Greg Gutfeld’s opening commentary on the March 25, 2022 edition of “Gutfeld!”


foxnews

Not all news on the site expresses the point of view of the site, but we transmit this news automatically and translate it through programmatic technology on the site and not from a human editor.
Back to top button