Why are Republicans so threatened by universal daycare?
Universal preschool, paid family leave, subsidized childcare… who could oppose Biden’s plans to help children? Senator Marsha Blackburn: “You know who else liked universal child care?” Another red plot has rumored! Photograph: Ken Cedeno / EPA Free child care equals class war, Republicans say Joe Biden wants to spend big bucks on small children. On Wednesday, the president announced an ambitious $ 1.8 billion plan to strengthen family support programs, children’s education and student aid. If passed, America’s Family Plan would overhaul the current (disastrous) child care system and inject billions into universal preschool, paid family leave and subsidized child care. It would be paid by raising taxes for the rich. Sounds good, doesn’t it? Who wouldn’t support investing in children? The celebration of “family values”, of course! The party that likes to stand up for embryos, but doesn’t seem as keen on helping children. As you might expect, Republicans are angry that the United States, which a recent survey found is the second worst place in the world to raise children, might become a little more supportive of the family. As soon as Biden finished speaking, the usual talking points emerged about how Biden was pushing a dangerous socialist agenda and trying to indoctrinate American children. “Do you know who else liked universal daycare?” Republican Senator Marsha Blackburn tweeted, linking to a 1974 article on child care in the Soviet Union. Do you think that’s a messy response? I think she may have been overwhelmed by JD Vance’s incomprehensible contribution to the debate. On Thursday, Hillbilly Elegy author and vocal Republican tweeted that “universal child care” is a class war against normal people. His reasoning, if you can call it that, was, “Normal Americans care more about their family than their job, and want a family policy that doesn’t direct their kids to a crappy daycare so that they don’t care. can enjoy more “freedom”. in the paid labor force ”. Maybe Republicans should get right to the point and say they don’t support any policies that make it easier for women to leave their homes. When you think that women are just walking in the womb, it is fitting that childcare costs are so high that they are pushing women out of the workforce. Earlier this year, Idaho lawmakers turned down a $ 6 million federal grant to support early childhood care and education. I repeat, they turned down millions of dollars for children. Why? As well as the representative of the Republican State. Charlie Shepherd explained that this money would harm “the family unit”. “[A]No bill that makes it easier or more convenient for mothers to get out of the house and let others raise their children, I don’t think that’s a good direction for us, ”Shepherd said. Really say the quiet part out loud! Richard Nixon made much the same argument in 1971, which was the last time the United States was on the verge of creating a universal child care system. Nixon vetoed the largely bipartisan effort, saying it would have “family implications.” By which, of course, he meant that it would facilitate the work of women. Do you know what “weakening the family” really means? Making the costs of having and raising children so ridiculously high that it is becoming increasingly difficult for anyone to afford a family. According to the Census Bureau, spending on child care increased by more than 40% from 1990 to 2011; childcare has become more expensive since then. The same geniuses who don’t want to expand access to child care regularly wring their hands in the face of falling birth rates in America. Why don’t people have children, they ask? It’s the economy, stupid. The pandemic has cost women more than $ 800 billion Women’s loss of income in 2020 totaled the combined wealth of 98 countries, reports Oxfam. Women, who are overrepresented in low-paid and precarious sectors like retail and catering, lost more than 64 million jobs in 2020, representing at least $ 800 billion in lost income globally . This estimate does not even include the wages lost by women working in the informal economy, such as domestic workers. Tear gas could be linked to abnormal periods Nearly 900 people have reported abnormal menstrual cycles after being exposed to tear gas during protests in Portland, Oregon last summer, according to a report. new study. Hundreds of people have also complained of other negative health effects. This is the first published and peer-reviewed study to confirm a link between tear gas and abnormal menstruation, but it is far from the first time that the dangers of tear gas have been discussed. Researchers have already found, for example, that the use of tear gas in Palestinian refugee camps has a devastating effect on the mental and physical health of residents. The Egyptian mummy was a pregnant woman and not a priest. Polish researchers have discovered the world’s first known case of such a well-preserved mummy of a pregnant woman. Insert your own mummy joke here. Why aren’t more lunar craters named after women? This is not a question that I really lost sleep on, I have to admit. However, efforts are underway to increase cosmic equality. German bombing squad investigates suspicious sex toy A concerned citizen stumbled upon what he believed to be a WWII bomb in the Bavarian Forest. After arriving at the scene and finding condoms in the neighborhood, police suspected it might be a bit more trite. “An internet search confirmed the suspicion,” police said. “There are actually sex toys in the form of hand grenades.” Pawtriarchy Week Four dogs who failed out of guide dog training have now been trained to detect the coronavirus at a hospital in Florida. More labs in labs please!