Craig Wright acquitted of all charges except number of conversions, jury awards $ 100 million to W&K Info Defense – Bitcoin News

The Kleiman v. Wright came to an end and Craig Wright and his defense team won on all claims except for a conversion count. Court reporter Craig Wright, the man claiming to be Satoshi Nakamoto, said he was “incredibly relieved.”

Craig Wright defense wins on all claims except conversion – Wright says “I’m not going anywhere, I’m here for the long haul”

After the jury got stuck in the Kleiman v. Wright for several days last week, jurors made a decision on Monday, December 6, 2021. Craig Wright and his defense team at Rivero Mestre LLP managed to beat all but one of the charges. number of conversions.

Jurors ruled that although Wright was cleared of most charges, he should pay W&K Info Defense $ 100 million and no punitive damages. Carolina Bolado, Law360 reporter at trial, Explain that Judge Beth Bloom praised lawyers who provided “superb representation” to their clients. Bolado too detailed that Wright said he was “incredibly relieved”.

The plaintiffs, the Kleiman Estate, accused Wright of manipulating the legacy and intellectual property of his former business partner Dave Kleiman. The preliminaries of the trial and the period of discovery lasted for years, with all sorts of mysteries in between.

Bitcoinsv Supporters (BSV) popular Wright’s victory on social media platforms and forums. However, other crypto advocates critical the Coingeek publication for reporting the verdict in a one-sided manner. Coingeek author Jordan Atkins claims in his headline that “Bitcoin Creator Craig Wright 100% Satoshi Nakamoto, Jury Says Kleiman v. Wright”.

“Thank you all for your support over the years,” Wright said in a video response following the verdict. “It has been a remarkable result and I feel completely justified. “Then there is more fighting. Were going to change everything … from cryptocurrency to digital money as it should. My original invention returns. I’m not going anywhere, I’m here for the long haul and I’m here for the fight.

Bitcoin advocates Snark at Wright’s so-called victory

A few other bitcoin advocates had different opinions of the result. Alistair Milne noted: “Craig Wright convicted of stealing the property of his deceased partner, fined $ 100 million.” Lawyer Stephen Palley tweeted: “MDR. People who think being hit by a $ 100 million jury verdict for conversion (theft) is a victory.”

Tags in this story

$ 100 million, $ 100 million, All accounts, Arthur van Pelt, billion, Billy Markus, Bitcoin, bitcoin lawsuit, BTC, Carolina Bolado, Conversion fees, Craig Wright, David Kleiman, Florida, Ira Kleiman, Jordan Atkins, jurors , Jury, Jury Trial, Kleiman Estate, Trial, miami, Satoshi Nakamoto, Southern District Court of Florida, Stephen Palley, Trial, Velvel Freedman

“Craig Wright is a charlatan pretending to be Satoshi with no proof and is being chased by another guy or something that I don’t remember,” Dogecoin co-founder Billy Markus tweeted. “Everything is stupid anyway and my tweet was only making fun of the morons blaming the developers and founders for the current trading price.”

The lawyer representing the Kleiman party appeared satisfied with the verdict when he tweeted “100,000,000” with a smiling emoji. “Craig Wright is now officially the most bankrupt Faketoshi of all time,” the Twitter account said. Arthur van pelt noted. Is this already a section in the Guinness Book of Records? »He also demand.

The trial could see some type of appeal process coming from both sides of the case in regards to the jurors’ recent decision. The social media hype is no different than any other day, as Wright’s supporters wholeheartedly believe the decision was a big win, Wright’s critics believe the case has proven that he did something wrong. Either way, the verdict is unlikely to change his mind with strong prejudices for or against Wright, and whether his Satoshi stories are right or wrong.

What do you think of the verdict in the Kleiman v. Wright? Let us know what you think of this topic in the comments section below.

Image credits: Shutterstock, Pixabay, Wiki Commons

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only. This is not a direct offer or the solicitation of an offer to buy or sell, nor a recommendation or endorsement of any product, service or business. does not provide investment, tax, legal, or accounting advice. Neither the company nor the author is responsible, directly or indirectly, for any damage or loss caused or allegedly caused by or in connection with the use of or reliance on any content, good or service mentioned in this article.


Not all news on the site expresses the point of view of the site, but we transmit this news automatically and translate it through programmatic technology on the site and not from a human editor.
Back to top button