HOUSTON (AP) — The experiences of panicked concertgoers who couldn’t breathe and had no clear path to escape from massive crowds at Houston’s deadly Astroworld music festival last year are featured in a documentary to be released Friday. .
But lawyers for Live Nation, which is being sued for its role as promoter of the festival, say they fear publicity for the documentary “Concert Crush: The Travis Scott Festival Tragedy” could “taint the jury”. A gag order has been issued in the case, but lawyers for Live Nation say a lawyer who filed lawsuits related to the tragedy also co-produced the documentary.
Charlie Minn, the film’s director, said he felt he made a balanced and fair film that tries to show audiences what happened.
“My job is to make the most truthful, honest and candid documentary from the victim’s perspective… We need to know these stories to prevent this from happening again,” Minn told The Associated Press.
About 500 lawsuits were filed following the Nov. 5 gig with Scott, a popular rapper. Ten people died and hundreds more were injured in the massive crowds. Scott is also being sued.
The documentary, which opens in 11 Texas cities including Austin, Dallas and Houston, includes interviews with several people who survived the surge of crowds. The film also features cellphone video shot by bystanders in which people can be heard repeatedly screaming for help.
“It’s hard to explain to friends and family what we saw and what we actually experienced and I think (the documentary) will give a lot of people the opportunity, if you weren’t there, understand,” said Frank Alvarez, who attended the concert but did not appear in the film.
The film shines a light on what viewers went through and what led to the tragedy, said Minn, who has also made documentaries about the fatal 2018 shooting at a suburban Houston high school and the violence along of the US-Mexico border.
The film suggests Scott could have done more to prevent the conditions that led to the victims, but Minn said it was not a “hit hit on Travis Scott.” He said it also questions whether others, including Live Nation and Houston police, could have done more to improve security or respond to danger more quickly. Minn said Scott, Live Nation and Houston police declined to be interviewed for the documentary. Houston police are investigating the disaster.
In a report released this month, a task force established by Texas Governor Greg Abbott uncovered permit issues for such events and called for “clearly defined triggers” to stop such a spectacle.
Lawyers for Live Nation expressed their concerns in a letter this month to District Judge Kristen Hawkins, who handles all pretrial matters in the prosecutions.
“The involvement of plaintiffs’ attorneys in the film and the publicity the filmmakers and producers are trying to generate for it raises significant questions about efforts to taint the jury,” wrote Neal Manne and Kevin Yankowsky, two of the attorneys. from Live Nation. the letter.
But the lawyers did not ask Hawkins to take any specific action regarding the documentary.
Manne and Yankowsky did not respond to emails seeking comment. Live Nation said it was “heartbroken” by what happened, but denied responsibility.
Scott’s attorneys said in an email Thursday that they don’t know if he’s seen the documentary and referenced concerns raised by Live Nation when asked if they had any issues with it- this.
“Mr. Scott remains focused on his philanthropic work in his hometown of Houston and in low-income communities of color across the country, both of which are long-standing endeavours,” his attorneys said.
Cassandra Burke Robertson, a law professor at Case Western Reserve University in Cleveland, said she would be shocked if the judge took action on the documentary because of First Amendment concerns, even with the gag order.
“I think the interest of the public here in exploring what happened and avoiding similar tragedies in the future is a very high interest. It will probably outweigh the interests of the particular outcome of the trial. particular,” Robertson said.
Brent Coon, a lawyer representing around 1,500 viewers who was interviewed in the documentary, said he didn’t think the film would impact the ability to choose an impartial jury if the case went to trial, which could take years.
“I don’t think any lawyer in this case can fan the flames to change much … what the public perception of all of this will be,” Coon said.
Robertson, who is not involved in the litigation, said the fact that one of the film’s co-producers, Rick Ramos, is representing viewers who have filed lawsuits could raise ethical concerns. It was unclear how Ramos benefited financially from his involvement in the documentary.
Ramos declined to comment on Thursday.
“I personally wouldn’t co-sponsor something like this during ongoing civil litigation. I don’t think there is anything wrong with that. It’s just something I wouldn’t do,” Coon said.
Minn said the questions posed about Ramos’ involvement are valid but he has never hidden his involvement.
“People have to watch the movie and judge it for what it is,” Minn said.
Follow Juan A. Lozano on Twitter: https://twitter.com/juanlozano70